College Players' Ineligibility

What should the age limit be for a student-athlete be to play for a college or university team? This is a long debated issue that still may fairness to the majority, but perhaps not for the minority. Those who transfer to 4-year colleges after completing 2 years or more of education at another institution are usually not effected by the rule for college sports. The problem, however for older candidates who have pursued to further their education a few years later after graduating high school or receiving an associates degree at a community college is they don't meet the guidelines of eligibility.

A student's academics conflict with their right to be considered active as a player. I think it's kind of pointless for suspended or ineligible college players to participate in team practices, but not in games. This isn't fun for them. They have to look on from the sidelines later and wish they could be joining their teammates in games. The NCAA seems clearly set on their limitations for student-athletes. I'd actually like to guys 24-26 be able to play on teams. Sure it sounds like a competitive advantage for certain teams, but this would also widen the scope of college basketball. By having older players there'd be a sense of diversity and added bonus for teams. Another talented player would be available to come off the bench and fill quality minutes.

When a player breaks the law, violates school code, gets arrested, or does something stupid, no doubt they should be put on probation or even banned depending how severe their actions are. On the other side of the coin, refusing to allow walk-ons or transfer students considered to be juniors and seniors to participate in regular sports functions is unjustified and overlooks contributing qualities to a sports program. The rules over time, given such considerations should be changed.