Those who have followed compelling sports cinema or actor Robert Redford's career will remember the movie, The Natural. I know baseball analysts absorbed into Major League players and pennant races like to share their personal opinions. Fans as well as the baseball community know former Cardinals pitcher Rick Ankiel has rehabbed, after being away from the game a few years and returned to the team this year only as a hitter in the lineup. So does that qualify him to be a exact duplication of the Roy Hobb's character in The Natural? I think a similarity is apparent, but that doesn't mean the two were the exact same as examined by ESPN writer Jim Caple.
Mr. Caple goes into detail about Hobbs being a womanizer (a male whore if you will) and how he didn't think twice about dropping his pants and leaving women in the dust after impregnating them. I don't know about ball players today, but a good percentage of men over time have been pulling this dirty business off for years! Bringing Rick Ankiel into the picture doesn't give him a good self-image by comparison. How does anyone know besides family and friends that he's a slime ball who's gets off knocking up random female admirers from town to town? Judgment ought to be reserved until facts are presented (Wouldn't say this about Barry Bonds and steroids use...just don't like the guy).
I happened to enjoy the baseball movie classic (if it wasn't deemed such the movie wouldn't be on reruns on the AMC channel, think about it). Sure Hobbs was an older player returning to the game after a long layoff with a shaky, questionable past involving being wounded by gun bullets to the ribs. Ankiel is much younger. To me I'm not sure why Hobbs wanted to meet with his old flame played by Glen Close because has anyone seen the actress on TV lately...sure resembles a man to me and looking a little rough under the edges...only kidding (still can't understand why her parents named her GLEN). As far as the comment about Roy Hobbs' miraculous hitting ability, once cranking 4 homeruns in a game even contemplating the guy used performance-enhancing drugs is downright unflattering. Remember this was a fictional story with fake names! Being singled-out as a heroin addict with torrents syndrome would have been fair game here.
He could have scaled a 20-foot wall to a make a leaping catch, got attacked by an aggressive pelican then hit a game-winning homer, or not even bothered to take a shower before having a sick 3-some back in the clubhouse with Pop still in the middle of a mid-life crisis. The judge, who owned part of the New York Knights as portrayed in the movie could have very easily just fired his ass after ripping up his contract for any reason especially after refusing to agree to throw a playoff game. Yeah, Hobbs was also involved in the whole gambling scene too so that must make him a horrible person, huh? He had came out of a semi-pro league as I recall and needed the money. It wasn't like the Knights offered him more than a couple hundred bucks a week to pay ball (hey, wait a minute, hell I'd even agree to those terms NOW).
In conclusion, active St. Louis Cardinals' player Rick Ankiel and Roy Hobbs aren't identical athletes. Even if Ankiel used this substance called the 'cream' how in the world would have the fictional baseball star got his hands on a drug which didn't existed in such an era plus had the syringe procedure done when he spent so much time with his damn Wonder Boy Bat he carved out of wood? Maybe Rick has gambled once or twice in his career, no proof on baseball games though. Lightning bolts sure don't strike either when he goes yard. Him daring the bat boy to drink a gallon of milk in 2 minutes for $10 yet isn't out of the question. If there is one thing I'll agree which both players are capable of doing is picking a fight with the team mascot for jumping in the line of a fair ball which cost them the game. Now that would be classic entertainment whether real or fictional.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment